🏗️ Scaling Your Repo for the Enterprise with Playwright

Playwright is blazing fast, beautifully expressive, and a dream for modern frontend testing — but getting it to work at scale? That’s where s*** gets real.
I’ve seen too many teams fall into the same trap: the initial Playwright setup works great when there are 5–10 tests. But fast forward a few sprints and suddenly you’re battling brittle selectors, inconsistent data, and a CI pipeline groaning under the weight of a monolithic suite. 👈 btw don’t do that.
Here’s how to evolve your Playwright repo from a scrappy MVP to an enterprise-grade testing framework that scales with your team and your product.
Phase 1: From Ad Hoc to Intentional
Most Playwright projects start with:
- A few smoke tests
- Inline locators and hardcoded data
- One big file, maybe two
This is fine to start, but the pain shows up quickly:
- Tests fail when the DOM changes
- You duplicate code across test files
- Your suite is slow and flaky in CI
👉 Goal: Transition from “just working” to “maintainable.”
Tactical upgrades:
- Adopt the Page Object Model (POM)
- Move test data to fixtures or factory functions
- Use
.env
and command-line args to support different environments - Configure
pytest
properly:pytest.ini
, markers, and test grouping
Phase 2: Organizing for Growth
As your suite grows, your folder structure must evolve. This is usually when you move from a flat test folder to a layered repo.
Key shifts:
- Split tests by feature area or team
- Introduce a
shared/
module with common utils and base classes - Add tagging via
@pytest.mark
to support smoke, regression, etc. - Use a custom
conftest.py
to load envs and centralize login/session setup
Bonus: Start thinking about parallelism. Playwright loves it — don’t wait until your test suite is 300+ cases long to start using --workers
.
Phase 3: Traceability and Dev Buy-In
At this stage, testing isn’t just your concern — it’s part of the delivery pipeline.
You need:
- Test <-> Requirement mapping: Integrate with Zephyr, TestRail, or similar
- Slack or Discord alerts for CI runs
- HTML test reports (Allure or similar)
- Failed test reruns to reduce flake
The Playwright suite becomes a living, traceable artifact — not a black box. Engineers and PMs should trust what your tests tell them.
Phase 4: Scaling to Enterprise
At the enterprise level, you’re likely managing:
- Dozens of contributors
- Multi-region environments
- Staging data collisions
- CI/CD across multiple pipelines
Here’s where you need to bring in the big guns:
1. Dockerize Your Test Suite
- Pin versions
- Run tests locally and in CI the same way
2. Use GitHub Actions or Jenkins Matrix Strategies
- Split tests by marker or folder
- Run in parallel shards
3. Tag Everything
- Make it easy to run just what you need:
@smoke
,@login
,@high_priority
4. Monitor Flake and Performance
- Log flaky tests over time
- Measure test duration by test and suite
5. Use AI — but Strategically
- Generate test cases only if you have stable data
- Use GenAI to propose assertions, not write full flaky tests
💡 Pro Tips from the Trenches
- Test Data Isolation: Use factories, APIs, or backend hooks to set up state
- Selector Resilience: Use
data-testid
, not brittle DOM paths - Fixture Reuse: Centralize login, setup, and teardown logic
- Makefiles: Speed up local dev with
make test-smoke
,make test-dev
, etc. - Secrets in CI: Don’t hardcode. Use GitHub Actions secrets or AWS Parameter Store
Final Thought
Playwright is a Ferrari — but it doesn’t drive itself.
If you're still treating your repo like a hobby project when your org is shipping serious software, it’s time to scale up.
You don’t just need more tests — you need better architecture, better hygiene, and a team that treats testing like a first-class citizen.
Ready to break the build — in the best way?
Comments ()